This post is a continuation of my investigation into the concept of the soul. Evolutionary biology, psychology and neuroscience have answered most if not all of my questions about the soul. Ultimately, as Jon and me agree: we will never know if a soul truly exists until we pass away.
This post helps shed more light on what I previously termed as a combination of the witness-consciousness and the self in the spheres of A and B. (More neuroscience and psychology to the rescue to teach us
humility through being critical about ourselves and our thoughts.)
The sense of our "self" is as an integrated individual inhabiting a body.
The “I” and the “me” are actually ever-changing narratives generated by our brain to provide a coherent framework to organize the output of all the factors that contribute to our thoughts and behaviors.
I is constructed from a multitude of unconscious mechanisms and processes.
Me is similarly constructed, though we may be more aware of the events that have shaped it over our lifetime. But neither is cast in stone and both are open to all manner of reinterpretation. As artists, illusionists, movie makers, and more recently experimental psychologists have repeatedly shown, conscious experience is highly manipulatable and context dependent. Our memories are also largely abstracted reinterpretations of events – we all hold distorted memories of past experiences.
We certainly have more choices today to do things that are not in accord with our biology, and it may be true that we should talk about free will in a meaningful way, as Dennett has argued, but that seems irrelevant to the central problem of positing an entity that can make choices independently of the multitude of factors that control a decision. To me, the problem of free will is a logical impasse – we cannot choose the factors that ultimately influence what we do and think. That does not mean that we throw away the social, moral, and legal rulebooks, but we need to be vigilant about the way our attitudes about individuals will be challenged as we come to understand the factors (both material and psychological) that control our behaviors when it comes to attributing praise and blame
The self illusion is probably an inescapable experience we need for interacting with others and the world, and indeed we cannot readily abandon or ignore its influence, but we should be skeptical that each of us is the coherent, integrated entity we assume we are.